Steven Hawkins

Forum

how old is he

>>By larry   (Thursday, 13 Mar 2003 12:23)



Steven Hawkins is a duck in a pond.

>>By Ally   (Tuesday, 18 Mar 2003 12:37)



I also know someone called Trev who is also a duck in a pond.

>>By Ally   (Tuesday, 18 Mar 2003 12:38)



I thought his game about skateboarding was fantastic. i dont get it though... how can somebody be so interlectual, explaining the complexities of the universe, and devote such a vast amount of time to the mastery of skate boarding....
Psyche... i couldn't be that stupid could i. well no i'm not. you folks that leave these rubbish messages on legitimate disscusion sites really bite. oh crap wait does that make me a hypocrite. fuck it, all you bitches can take a long lick of my balls, peace.......................................

>>By Tom Errington   (Tuesday, 1 Apr 2003 11:26)



Amazing chap, him. Was having an argument last night about where he comes from, my mate reckoned he's American, but he' s got to be English with the I.Q he's got. Can someone settle it for us?

>>By Bowyer   (Thursday, 3 Apr 2003 17:43)



I am, of course, English!   (Thursday, 3 Apr 2003 17:44)



Would love to meet Steven Hawkins. Any suggestions on a meeting with him ? Is it possible >? MarkandIris2@aol.com

>>By Mark D WIlliams - Iris   (Tuesday, 8 Apr 2003 16:51)



i think my science teacher looks like steven hawkins. mr.hawkins is a relly good scientist.

>>By baby taz   (Friday, 9 May 2003 18:44)



he is so cool with the black holes and stuff!!

>>By sam   (Tuesday, 13 May 2003 12:01)



he is a scientist

>>By gemma   (Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:53)



when i look at the stars i sit and take pitty on my self. why god, why.

>>By firthy   (Wednesday, 11 Jun 2003 13:38)



my eyes mean a lot to me, when i look up at the stars i sit and wonder, and wonder, and wonder, and wonder.

>>By steve   (Wednesday, 11 Jun 2003 13:41)



I'd like to see him make a 'definate' statement... we all have theories, his are just more thought out than most....but what does he really think?????

>>By Kate   (Monday, 16 Jun 2003 16:22)



Are ya'll crazy? Faster than light was proven by Archimedes, with the lever equalling the movement. It's only a matter of having the energy (which there is'nt enough in convential physics.
Black holes are an inverted equation, balloons backward.
Need I go on?!?

>>By Mouse   (Thursday, 24 Jul 2003 11:57)



[quote]If space is made of a vacuuous "nothing", and the Earth's atmosphere is clear, why is the sky blue during the day and black at night? We both understand the light refraction which creates colours during the day, but began to question why the universe is "black". How can something that is completely empty be black, should it not be clear, like you can see through it? [/quote]

Just have to say the " Vacuous nothing " must be no more then the empty space between objects... An object is only seen after a photon has hit something and is reflected back to the viewer stimulating the viewer's retina... So if you are not looking at anything there is nothing to see....[;)]

In fact I have long thought that our Universe is nothing more then the inside of a Giant Black Hole, filled with infinite Galaxies all of which have there own Black Hole.... Now a proven Fact!!! That is why we never can see what is outside our Universe, since we all know that nothing escapes once inside....

Back Holes are the answer to the balance maintained and keeps the Universe going... They are the Ultimate recycling machine... We already as a species of this Universe know that truly a Black Hole does not just suck up everything, and keep it inside its' self ... As matter is taken in there is, as shown by Hubbell Photos, an ejecta stream.... Matter being returned as raw materials used to coalesce back together to form new stars, which in turns forms new galaxies, and new worlds, and most likely new species...

Heck now thinking a bit, smell the brain matter working?[:D] After watching the Discovery show on the new string theory, Black Holes could be the link to the ends of these strings they were talking about.... Go figure.... [?]

We also already know, after our short time on this planet as space time goes, that if we are ever going to solve the questions about our Universe... We first have to solve the problem of living, and working together.... Our instinct to survive is very strong, we are at a threshold to guarantee our survival as a species, by learning everything we can.... But the one thing that is for sure, if we do not learn to travel through space, we are doomed as a species..... For we as a species will eventually end up getting sucked up into our very own Black Hole.[:O][?] What a waste.....

We already have found planets in other galaxies, the probability that life other then ours, is as great as the probability that we exist... The real question then is, why would a more advance life form would ever want to communicate with a species that can not get along with itself?[:O][?][:D]

I was reading about Voyager 1 being on the verge of leaving our solar system.... Do you really think we got it thoughly sterilzed as it soared through our atmosphere, beginning its' journey? We already may have sowed the seeds of our continuing existance.... Containating the Universe....[?][;)]


Jaybird1
RDF's[url="http://www.junkyard-wars.com/forum/default.asp"][blue] Junkyard Wars Forum[/blue] [/url] Administrator

>>By Jaybird1   (Monday, 10 Nov 2003 21:40)



The discussion board is currently closed.