Henry Lincoln

Forum

someone should perhaps try other more modern paintings for hidden geometry i would suggest dali's the last supper. also has leonardo been consulted

>>By mark   (Tuesday, 28 Jan 2003 09:56)



Anyone thought about Henry Lincolns Key in the Appendix of "The Holy Place" and thought of trying to use it in the old testament? Micheal Drosnin discoveries in the book "Bible Code 2" with key works found like "Twin Towers, Aeroplane going through the word "Twin Towers" in diagonalls and "Bin Laden Guilty" on the same page in the unencripted ond testament. Issue is Drosnin hasn't found the Key and these are suppoessed to be discovered soon to unlock the bible.

Is Lincoln's Key the key to unlocking all Holy scriptures and not just the ones found at the chatteau?

email neil at beverleyac dot everyone dot net

>>By Neil   (Wednesday, 19 Feb 2003 21:17)



I finally got around to reading Holy Blood Hoy Grail and was quite fascinated and impressed. To check out the accuracy of the authors' scholarship I began to prowl around the web looking for their critics and discovered.....

http://smithpp0.tripod.com/psp/idx.html

Any discussion would be appreciated. I am looking for the web addresses or e-mail addresses of the Holy Blood Holy Grail authors. Please advise johnhartyoung@yahoo.com

>>By John Hart Young MA   (Thursday, 15 May 2003 06:40)



I also would like to see more discussion on this. I certainly wish some knowledgable historians would undertake a critical examination of this work, but as far as I know, none have. If you know of any such responses please let me know at protonphoton@hotmail.com.

If Holy Blood, Holy Grail is a hoax, such a response as I just described would be the only way to dispose of it. I wonder if established historians feel that it is above their diginity to respond to works like this, but without such a response, there is uncertainty among us, the reading public.

>>By Uji/Clan   (Friday, 25 Jul 2003 07:41)



Regarding the Templars' Secret Island --- on page 52 fig 6 "The geometrical key "
In referring to the distance from the point @ Vestermarie to Nylars being equal to "a quarter of the circle's radius, i.e. it is one fourth of the distance from Nylars to Osterlars" I find a little fault . Unless the construction and relative placement of Vestermarie on the pattern in my book is inaccurately represented, when I measure the distance, multiply times 4 and then apply that length beginning at Nylars and aimed at Osterlars this distance is considerably longer than the radius of the circle. Perhaps I am not measuring accurately. When I find such discrepancies in this type of analysis at such an early point in the "proof" I wonder about other inaccuracies that I have overlooked or are yet to come. Did anyone else actually measure this distance ???? darnie

>>By darnie   (Thursday, 25 Sep 2003 06:44)



The discussion board is currently closed.